Skip to main content
File #: 25-0028    Version: 1
Type: decision Status: Filed
File created: 1/2/2025 In control: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Agenda date: 1/15/2025 Final action: 1/15/2025
Title: New member applications review
Attachments: 1. Applications

Title

New member applications review

 

Recommended Action

Move to recommend three candidates and two alternates to fill the upcoming vacancies on the BPAC.

 

Report

Issue:

Evaluate and recommend candidates to serve on the BPAC to the City Council’s Community Livability and Public Safety Committee.

 

Staff Contact:

Max DeJarnatt, Associate Planner, Public Works | Transportation, 360.570.3723

 

Presenter(s):

Max DeJarnatt, Associate Planner

 

Background and Analysis:

Introduction

12 people submitted applications to fill the three upcoming vacancies on the BPAC. BPAC members have had the opportunity to evaluate, score, and submit the scores to the staff liaison ahead of this meeting. The liaison will share the results of the scores during the meeting to help guide the discussion on whom to recommend.

 

Since there are three vacancies, staff recommends that the BPAC choose three people to recommend and two alternates.

 

Scoring and ranking process

On January 3rd the staff liaison emailed redacted versions of the applications, attached, to committee members and asked them to score the candidates based on the criteria below. Many BPAC members replied before the meeting with their scores. Others will share them during the meeting, and all of the scores will be shown publicly.

 

The scores are meant to be a guide for the meeting’s discussion. The candidates who score the highest may not be the candidates the BPAC recommends for appointment. The BPAC will make its decision during the meeting after discussing the initial results of the scores. 

 

The scores are based on these criteria:

 

                     Unique perspective

                     Engagement in walking, biking, and transit

                     Interest in community involvement

 

Committee members scored the candidates on a scale of 1 to 5 in each of those categories. Additionally, Committee members considered a general idea of where each candidate lives to have fairly even geographic representation. For example, the staff liaison included a note such as “eastside” or “downtown” for each candidate in the evaluation sheet emailed to Committee members. To help in that consideration, the staff liaison also included a list of the general areas represented by continuing members as well.

 

Next steps

After the BPAC recommends at least three people to fill the upcoming vacancies, that recommendation will be shared with the Community Livability and Public Safety Committee, a subcommittee of the City Council. CLPS will likely consider the recommendation and then make its own recommendation to the full City Council in time for the new members’ terms to begin on April 1st.

 

All the candidates will be invited to attend this meeting and may be listening in to the Committee’s discussion. They will not be asked to address the BPAC.

 

 

Options:

1.                     Option 1: recommend three candidates and two alternates to fill the upcoming vacancies.

2.                     Option 2: not recommend candidates to fill the upcoming vacancies. This will require that the Community Livability and Public Safety Committee evaluate all 12 of the applicants without the benefit of the BPAC’s input.

 

Financial Impact:

There is no financial impact from this item.

 

Attachments:

Applications