Skip to main content
File #: 16-0416    Version: 1
Type: contract Status: Passed
File created: 3/18/2016 In control: City Council
Agenda date: 4/26/2016 Final action: 4/26/2016
Title: Approval of Interlocal Agreement Between Thurston County and the Cities of Lacey, Olympia and Tumwater for Joint Storm and Surface Water Monitoring
Attachments: 1. Interlocal Agreement
Title
Approval of Interlocal Agreement Between Thurston County and the Cities of Lacey, Olympia and Tumwater for Joint Storm and Surface Water Monitoring

Recommended Action
Committee Recommendation:
Not referred to a committee.

City Manager Recommendation:
Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement Between Thurston County and the Cities of Lacey, Olympia and Tumwater for Joint Storm and Surface Water Monitoring and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.

Report
Issue:
Whether to approve and sign the agreement to continue monitoring Olympia surface waters through the regional program as described in the interlocal agreement.

Staff Contact:
Jeremy Graham, Associate Planner, Public Works Water Resources, 360.753.8097

Presenter(s):
None - Consent item

Background and Analysis:
Since 1991, Thurston County Environmental Health has performed water quality monitoring for Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater.

The program specifically monitors water quality parameters, stream flows, and precipitation. The mission of the joint storm and surface water monitoring program is to:
* Assess the health of regional water resources in order to make informed program decisions;
* Assist with policy and capital facility planning to protect water resources.

The most recent interlocal monitoring agreement from 2012 has expired. The Cities and County wish to continue the monitoring program as outlined in the interlocal monitoring agreement.

Neighborhood/Community Interests (if known):
No known concerns.

Options:
Option 1: Approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign. This allows the City to continue its long-term surface water monitoring partnership with Thurston County and the Cities of Lacey and Tumwater. This is the most cost effective option because the County and Cities are combining resources.

Option 2: Decline the request to approve and sign the agreement. Staff would evaluate the feasibility of adding monitoring tasks to City st...

Click here for full text