Skip to main content
File #: 16-0712    Version: 1
Type: discussion Status: Filed
File created: 5/31/2016 In control: Community & Economic Revitalization Committee (CERC)
Agenda date: 6/13/2016 Final action: 6/13/2016
Title: Kaiser-Harrison Opportunity Area Plan Update
Attachments: 1. Webpage
Related files: 16-0483
Title
Kaiser-Harrison Opportunity Area Plan Update

Recommended Action
Committee Recommendation:
Not referred to a committee.

City Manager Recommendation:
Briefing only. No action requested.

Report
Issue:
Whether to discuss the draft Kaiser Harrison Opportunity Area Plan (See attached link to the Plan web page for copy of the Opportunity Area Plan, and proposed amendments to Olympia Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code).

Staff Contact:
Joyce Phillips, Senior Planner, Community Planning and Development, 360.570.3722

Presenter(s):
Joyce Phillips, Senior Planner, Community Planning and Development

Background and Analysis:
The Kaiser Harrison Opportunity Area subarea planning process was conducted based on direction provided in the 2013 Investment Strategy and the Economy chapter of the comprehensive plan.

The Investment Strategy recommended that the City:
* Remove barriers for mixed use development
* Fund infrastructure improvements, and
* Consider zoning changes that permit retail and residential uses, such as High Density Corridor.

The comprehensive plan called for follow up planning work to be conducted in these opportunity areas to encourage growth in targeted areas.

The City began this work in mid-to-late 2015 by updating the market study that had been conducted in 2013 and by interviewing stakeholders within the study area and surrounding area, as well as Intercity Transit staff. In early 2016, public workshops and meetings were conducted in order to get a better sense of the types of development desired for this area. Over the months of February and March, there were six meetings to gather community input. Staff also received comments via email and met with people who were unable to attend these meetings but wanted the opportunity to participate.

The majority of the public comments received were fairly consistent. People generally wanted the area to be bicycle and pedestrian friendly with connections to n...

Click here for full text