File #: 22-0542    Version: 1
Type: discussion Status: Filed
File created: 5/24/2022 In control: PBIA Advisory Board
Agenda date: 6/1/2022 Final action: 6/1/2022
Title: Downtown Residential Parking Incentives Briefing
Attachments: 1. Existing Map, 2. Proposed Map
Title
Downtown Residential Parking Incentives Briefing

Recommended Action
Information only. No action requested.

Report
Issue:
Discussion on the Downtown Parking Incentives for residential development

Staff Contact:
Joyce Phillips, Principal Planner, Community Planning and Development, 360.570.3722

Presenter(s):
Joyce Phillips, Principal Planner, Community Planning and Development
Max DeJarnatt, Program Analyst, Community Planning and Development

Background and Analysis:
At its February 17, 2022, meeting, the Land Use and Environment Committee (LUEC) referred to the Planning Commission a potential revision to the Downtown Exempt Parking Area map and requirements. The proposal, if approved, would make the area within the boundary exempt from parking requirements for residential development.

Approximately 2 years ago, Community Planning and Development staff noted that several housing projects that had gone through the presubmission conference stage of review were not proceeding to the application stage. Upon inquiry, it was noted that the parking requirements were one of the reasons some of these projects were not moving forward.

In March 2021 the LUEC discussed potential revisions to the Downtown Exempt Parking Area boundary. The proposal was to keep the outer boundary the same, as is shown in Figure 38-2 of Chapter 18.38 of the Olympia Code (see Attachment 1), but to make the entire area exempt from minimum parking requirements for residential development rather than having a portion of the boundary limited to a 10% reduction in residential parking requirements.

The Committee referred the issue to the Planning Commission but asked staff to first compile data to help inform the Commission about parking demands in the area and the impact any changes would have on surrounding neighborhoods.

Staff have collected and reviewed data but it does not provide the level of detail that was originally requested by the LUEC.

Staff have been surveying the downt...

Click here for full text